Energy Bill Explainer

It is often a struggle to develop balanced, sound public policy when there are conflicting goals and desires.  Related to the Holcomb Coal Plants, we want economic growth, inexpensive energy and yet a clean environment and better health for our children.

Solutions require elected officials to recognize those competing goals, to be frank about them and the tradeoffs they require, and to take the lead in resolving the inevitable conflicts.  

The issue debated yesterday is laced with potential peril for the future of Kansas.  Realistically, future electrical energy needs in our state will rely on a stable base of coal, nuclear, and gas.  Better control of pollution and emissions must be part of our future portfolio.  Conservation and development of clean, renewable energy must also be part of that same portfolio.

The House Bill would allow the building of the two Holcomb plants, re-engage the regulatory process to the rule of law.  In addition, it provided for the first Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) in the listing of the state.  It will require 5% of electric energy come from renewables in 2012 and 10% in 2020.  This is required of all energy producers not just Sunflower.  There are many other features including the first net metering law for Kansas.  In short, there is much to love and much to hate no matter what your position.  I voted “aye” with a 77-44 vote.

Thank you for your interest in a better Kansas.

Home